PENERAPAN STRATEGI PENDEKATAN COLLABORATIVE PLANNING PADA POLITEKNIK STIA LAN MAKASSAR

Isi Artikel Utama

Astriana Astriana
Muhammad Irfan

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat sejauh mana penerapan pendekatan collaborative planning dalam meningkatkan kualitas dokumen Perencanaan pada Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasari oleh kondisi dimana proses penyusunan dokumen perencanaan masih didominasi oleh pendekatan top-down. Artinya, perencanaan lebih banyak diarahkan oleh kebijakan tingkat atas tanpa melibatkan partisipasi yang memadai dari pemangku kepentingan di tingkat pelaksana atau penerima manfaat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi untuk mengumpulkan data primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan collaborative planning telah diterapkan, namun belum secara optimal karena adanya kendala dan permasalahan, seperti proses yang masih didominasi oleh pihak manajemen dan perencana formal, sementara keterlibatan dosen, tenaga kependidikan, dan mahasiswa belum optimal, adanya keterbatasan waktu dalam penyusunan dokumen, dan jumlah formasi fungsional perencana yang masih belum terpenuhi. Penelitian ini menawarkan kebaruan dengan mengkaji penerapan pendekatan collaborative planning dalam konteks institusi pendidikan pemerintahan, yang selama ini relatif kurang mendapat perhatian dalam literatur perencanaan publik. Temuan penelitian ini tidak hanya memperkaya diskursus teoritis mengenai perencanaan kolaboratif di lingkungan birokrasi pendidikan, tetapi juga memberikan implikasi praktis berupa rekomendasi penguatan mekanisme partisipatif, tata kelola perencanaan, serta peran perencana sebagai fasilitator kolaborasi dalam meningkatkan kualitas dokumen perencanaan kelembagaan.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Astriana, A., & Irfan, M. (2025). PENERAPAN STRATEGI PENDEKATAN COLLABORATIVE PLANNING PADA POLITEKNIK STIA LAN MAKASSAR . ADMIT: Jurnal Administrasi Terapan, 3(2), 260–278. Diambil dari https://journal.stialanmakassar.ac.id/index.php/admit/article/view/3923
Bagian
Articles

Referensi

Akbar, I. (2024). E-government, participatory planning, and policy development: An efforts to construct multi-sector collaboration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2952(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213071/3304254

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUM032

Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAN1114

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent issues in practice and research. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956/CO-PRODUCTION-CO-CREATION-TACO-BRANDSEN-BRAM-VERSCHUERE-TRUI-STEEN/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Bryson, J. M. ., & George, Bert. (2024). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations : a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382254675_Strategic_Planning_for_Public_and_Nonprofit_Organizations_A_Guide_to_Strengthening_and_Sustaining_Organizational_Achievement_6th_Edition

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.12238

Clark, J. K. (2021). Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process. American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956397;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:ARPB

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/research-design/book270550

Duxbury, N., & Jeannotte, M. S. (2015). Making It Real: Measures of Culture in Local Sustainability Planning and Implementation. Making Culture Count, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46458-3_10

Fonataba, J. (2025). Kolaborasi Pemerintah, Swasta, dan Masyarakat dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Dasar di Merauke. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(4), 1376–1395. https://doi.org/10.63822/VMTHGF73

Fox, J., & Margalit, T. (2025). Beyond the professional–local knowledge dichotomy: Toward a new epistemology in urban planning. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251375771;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:USJA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Collaborative Planning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy, 1–237. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864302/PLANNING-COMPLEXITY-JUDITH-INNES-DAVID-BOOHER/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Iqbal, M., Nursida, & Zaskia. (2025). Public Understanding, The Role of Local Actors, and Innovation in Collaboration to Alleviate Poverty in Tolitoli City. Perkembangan Kajian Sosial, 2(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.69616/PERKASA.V2I2.323

Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229810;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:EPCB;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:SAGE;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Lusiani, M., Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Dewulf, G. (2013). Planning and commitment in cultural heritage projects. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0052

Mariani, L., Trivellato, B., Martini, M., & Marafioti, E. (2022). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Collaborative Innovation: Evidence from Four European Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 2022 180:4, 180(4), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-022-05193-Z

OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019 (Government at a Glance). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8CCF5C38-EN

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice - Michael Quinn Patton - Google Buku (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pirnejad, P. (2017). ELEMENTS OF A SUCCESSFUL MULTI-SECTORAL COLLABORATIVE FROM A LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE A FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE-DIMENSIONS SHARED BY AWARD WINNING MULTI-SECTORAL PARTNERSHIPS. University of Southern California.

Rudolf, S. C., & Grădinaru, S. R. (2019). The quality and implementation of local plans: An integrated evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317737070;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Sari, A. R. (2023). The Impact of Good Governance on the Quality of Public Management Decision Making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.61100/ADMAN.V1I2.21

Sartika, I. (2024). Collaborative Governance Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan di Kabupaten Bekasi Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 16(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.33701/JIAPD.V16I2.4864

Savini, F. (2019). Responsibility, polity, value: The (un)changing norms of planning practices. Planning Theory, 18(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218770474

Schatz, L., & Rogers, D. (2016). Participatory, technocratic and neoliberal planning: an untenable planning governance ménage à trois. Australian Planner, 53(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1135816;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:RAPL20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER

Winkler, T., & Duminy, J. (2016). Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories1. Planning Theory, 15(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214551113