IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING APPROACH STRATEGY AT POLITEKNIK STIA LAN MAKASSAR

Main Article Content

Astriana Astriana
Muhammad Irfan

Abstract

This study aims to see the extent to which the collaborative planning approach has been implemented in improving the quality of planning documents at the STIA LAN Makassar Polytechnic. The background of this study is based on conditions where the process of preparing planning documents is still dominated by a top-down approach. This means that planning is more directed by top-level policies without involving adequate participation from stakeholders at the implementing or beneficiary levels. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach through interviews, observations and documentation to collect primary and secondary data. The results of this study indicate that the collaborative planning approach has been implemented, but not optimally due to obstacles and problems, such as the process that is still dominated by management and formal planners, while the involvement of lecturers, education staff, and students is not optimal, there is limited time in preparing documents, and the number of functional planner formations that are still not fulfilled. This study offers novelty by examining the application of the collaborative planning approach in the context of government educational institutions, which has received relatively little attention in the public planning literature. The findings of this study not only enrich the theoretical discourse on collaborative planning in the educational bureaucracy, but also provide practical implications in the form of recommendations for strengthening participatory mechanisms, planning governance, and the role of planners as facilitators of collaboration in improving the quality of institutional planning documents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Astriana, A., & Irfan, M. (2025). IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE PLANNING APPROACH STRATEGY AT POLITEKNIK STIA LAN MAKASSAR. Jurnal Administrasi Terapan, 3(2), 260–278. Retrieved from https://journal.stialanmakassar.ac.id/index.php/admit/article/view/3923
Section
Articles

References

Akbar, I. (2024). E-government, participatory planning, and policy development: An efforts to construct multi-sector collaboration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2952(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213071/3304254

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUM032

Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAN1114

Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent issues in practice and research. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956/CO-PRODUCTION-CO-CREATION-TACO-BRANDSEN-BRAM-VERSCHUERE-TRUI-STEEN/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Bryson, J. M. ., & George, Bert. (2024). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations : a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382254675_Strategic_Planning_for_Public_and_Nonprofit_Organizations_A_Guide_to_Strengthening_and_Sustaining_Organizational_Achievement_6th_Edition

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.12238

Clark, J. K. (2021). Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process. American Review of Public Administration, 51(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020956397;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:ARPB

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/research-design/book270550

Duxbury, N., & Jeannotte, M. S. (2015). Making It Real: Measures of Culture in Local Sustainability Planning and Implementation. Making Culture Count, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-46458-3_10

Fonataba, J. (2025). Kolaborasi Pemerintah, Swasta, dan Masyarakat dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Dasar di Merauke. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(4), 1376–1395. https://doi.org/10.63822/VMTHGF73

Fox, J., & Margalit, T. (2025). Beyond the professional–local knowledge dichotomy: Toward a new epistemology in urban planning. Urban Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251375771;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:USJA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2020-5001

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Collaborative Planning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy, 1–237. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864302/PLANNING-COMPLEXITY-JUDITH-INNES-DAVID-BOOHER/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Iqbal, M., Nursida, & Zaskia. (2025). Public Understanding, The Role of Local Actors, and Innovation in Collaboration to Alleviate Poverty in Tolitoli City. Perkembangan Kajian Sosial, 2(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.69616/PERKASA.V2I2.323

Laurian, L. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229810;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Leino, H., & Puumala, E. (2021). What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(4), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420957337;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:EPCB;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:SAGE;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Lusiani, M., Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Dewulf, G. (2013). Planning and commitment in cultural heritage projects. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2012-0052

Mariani, L., Trivellato, B., Martini, M., & Marafioti, E. (2022). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Collaborative Innovation: Evidence from Four European Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 2022 180:4, 180(4), 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-022-05193-Z

OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019 (Government at a Glance). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8CCF5C38-EN

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice - Michael Quinn Patton - Google Buku (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pirnejad, P. (2017). ELEMENTS OF A SUCCESSFUL MULTI-SECTORAL COLLABORATIVE FROM A LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE A FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE-DIMENSIONS SHARED BY AWARD WINNING MULTI-SECTORAL PARTNERSHIPS. University of Southern California.

Rudolf, S. C., & Grădinaru, S. R. (2019). The quality and implementation of local plans: An integrated evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317737070;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI

Sari, A. R. (2023). The Impact of Good Governance on the Quality of Public Management Decision Making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.61100/ADMAN.V1I2.21

Sartika, I. (2024). Collaborative Governance Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan di Kabupaten Bekasi Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 16(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.33701/JIAPD.V16I2.4864

Savini, F. (2019). Responsibility, polity, value: The (un)changing norms of planning practices. Planning Theory, 18(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218770474

Schatz, L., & Rogers, D. (2016). Participatory, technocratic and neoliberal planning: an untenable planning governance ménage à trois. Australian Planner, 53(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2015.1135816;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:RAPL20;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER

Winkler, T., & Duminy, J. (2016). Planning to change the world? Questioning the normative ethics of planning theories1. Planning Theory, 15(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214551113