COLLABORATIVE PROCESS DALAM PENGELOLAAN DESA WISATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v28i3.1723Keywords:
Pariwisata, Desa Wisata, Proses KolaboratifAbstract
Pariwisata merupakan bidang yang sangat penting dan terus harus dikembangkan pengelolaannya setiap tahunnya. Salah satunya dengan memanfaatkan objek wisata yang ada. Akan tetapi, kondisi pandemi sekarang mengakibatkan sektor pariwisata di Indonesia khususnya pendapatan mengalami penurunan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana bentuk pengelolaan objek wisata Rammang-Rammang di Kabupaten Maros melalui salah satu indikator model Collaborative Governance oleh Ansell dan Gash (2008). Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif. Di mana teknik Pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, studi pustaka, observasi, dan dokumentasi. penelitian ini teknik sampel yang digunakan ialah purposive dan snowball dengan informan kunci meliputi; pengelola desa, pemerintah daerah, pedagang, dan masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa collaborative process dalam pengelolaan objek wisata Rammang-Rammang Kabupaten Maros belum cukup berjalan baik. Pada collaborative process: (1) Dialog tatap muka,; sudah diterapkan namun masih sebatas formalitas melalui Musrenbang (2) Membangun kepercayaan, masih belum maksimal terjalin dikarenakan terdapat pihak yang kurang dilibatkan; (3) Komitmen,belum terbangun pada pihak masyarakat karena pasif dalam memberikan saran ; (4) Pemahamanbersama, masih belum ada karena tidak adanya gramd desain wisata ; (5) Hasil Jangka menengah, belum sepenuhnya tercapai karena konsep pembangunan pariwisata atau grand desain wisata yang belum terealisasi.
Tourism is a very significant field and its management must be sustained to be developed every year. One of them by establishing existing tourist objects. However, the current pandemic condition has impacted the tourism sector in Indonesia, especially the income from tourism, experiencing a decline. This study aims to see how the management of the Rammang- Rammang tourist attraction in Maros Regency is from the perspective of one of the indicators of the Collaborative Governance model by Ansell and Gash (2008). The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method. the data were collected by interviews, literature study, observation, and documentation. In this study, the sample technique used was purposive and snowball with key informants including; village managers, local governments, traders, and the community.The results showed that the collaborative process in the management of the Rammang-Rammang tourism object in Maros Regency had not run well enough. In the collaborative process: (1) face-to-face dialogue; has been implemented but is still a formality through Musrenbang (2) trust building, it is still not maximally established because there are parties who are not involved; (3) Commitment has not been developed on the part of the community because it is passive in providing suggestions; (4) Mutual understanding still does not exist because of the absence of a tourism design program; (5) The medium-term results have not been fully achieved because the concept of tourism development or the grand design of tourism has not been realized
Downloads
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, C., Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach. Policy and society, 39(4), 570-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
Avoyan, E., van Tatenhove, J., & Toonen, H. (2017). The performance of the Black Sea Commission as a collaborative governance regime. Marine Policy, 81, 285-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.006
Basadur, M., Pringle, P., Speranzini, G., & Bacot, M. (2000). Collaborative Problem Solving Through Creativity in Problem Definition: Expanding the Pie. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00157
Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2019). The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 13(2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0008
Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100301
Cordery, C., Baskerville, R., & Porter, B. (2010). Control or collaboration?: Contrasting accountability relationships in the primary health sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(6), 793–813. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011065880
Dewi, M. H. U. (2013). Pengembangan desa wisata berbasis partisipasi masyarakat lokal di Desa Wisata Jatiluwih Tabanan, Bali. Jurnal Kawistara, 3(2) 117-126. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.3976
Djabbari, M. H., Alwi, A., & Thamrin, S. H. (2021). Implementasi Public Private Partnership dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata di Kabupaten Toraja Utara. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 7(1), 1-13. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jakpp/article/view/13203
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Fanani, A. F., & Ibrahim, S. (2018). Collaborative Governance Dalam Kemandirian Desa: Studi pada Implementasi Undang-undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa di Kabupaten Sidoarjo. DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v3i2.148
Fauzi, A. R., & Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2019). Collaborative Governance Penanganan HIV AIDS di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Sawala J. Adm. Negara, 7(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v7i1.887
Hadi, K., Asworo, L., & Taqwa, I. (2020). Inovasi Dialogis: Menuju Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Yang Partisipatif (Kajian Sistem Pelayanan Malang Online). Journal of Government and Civil Society, 4(1), 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v4i1.2438
Halibas, A. S., Sibayan, R. O., & Maata, R. L. R. (2017). The Penta Helix Model of Innovation in Oman: An HEI Perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 12, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.28945/3735
Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., & Stafford, E. R. (2002). Environmental Collaboration. In Partnership and Leadership (pp. 21-40). Springer, Dordrecht.
Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
Hermawan, H. (2016). Dampak pengembangan Desa Wisata Nglanggeran terhadap ekonomi masyarakat lokal. Jurnal Pariwisata, 3(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.31294/par.v3i2.1383
Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2016). Uniformity in Local Government System and the Governance Model in Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909616666105
Islamy, L. O., & Andriani, R. . (2022). Collaborative Governance Process Of Village Fund Management. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v28i1.1678
Klijin, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public Management and Policy Networks : The Theoritical Foundation of the Network Approach to Governance. Academia, 2(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030000000007
Maulana, R. Y. (2020). Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of E Government-Based Public Services Inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 5(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7317
O’Doherty, K., Gauvin, F. P., Grogan, C., & Friedman, W. (2012). Implementing a public deliberative forum. Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.28
O’Leary, T. J., Slutsky, J. R., & Bernard, M. A. (2010). Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities at Federal Agencies : The View from the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute on Aging, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(6), 1187–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02939.x
Rentandatu, B., Alwi, A., & Djabbari, M. H. (2021). Local Community-based Tourism in The Frame Institutional Theory. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 112-130. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jakpp/article/view/18564
Rijali, A. (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374
Robertson, P. J., & Choi, T. (2010). Ecological Governance : Organizing Principles for an Emerging Era. Public Administration Review, 1(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02250.x
Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.008
Scott, T. (2015). Does collaboration make any difference? Linking collaborative governance to environmental outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(3), 537-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21836
Sudirman, F. A., Basri, M., Huda, K., & Upe, A. (2020). Collaborative Governance Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Sebagai Upaya Pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (Sdgs). Jurnal Neo Societal; Vol, 5(4), 381-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.52423/jns.v5i4.14500
Tongkotow, N. F., Waworundeng, W., & Kimbal, A. (2021). Collaborative Governance Dalam Pengelolaan Wisata Pantai Lakban di Kecamatan Ratatotok. GOVERNANCE, 1(1), 1-11. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/governance/article/view/33717
Ulibarri, N., & Scott, T. A. (2017). Linking network structure to collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw041
Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., de Jong, J., & Keijser, B. (2020). Paradoxes of collaborative governance: investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. Public Management Review, 22(3), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056
Yahya H., & Sudarmo. (2022). Collaborative Governance dalam Program “EPPSON” Sebagai Perwujudan Smart City di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Mahasiswa Wacana Publik, 2(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.20961/wp.v2i1.63278
Yuliarti, M. S., Hastjarjo, S., & Anggreni, L. S. (2017, November). Smart City and Diffusion of Innovations Process: Communicating “Solo Destination” as IoT Implementation of Smart City in Surakarta. In 3rd International Conference on Transformation in Communications 2017 (IcoTiC 2017) (pp. 365-369). Atlantis Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).