• Nirwati Yapardy Pusat Pelatihan dan Pengembangan dan Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan
Keywords: training evaluation, mental revolution, improvement after training, inhibiting and supporting factors



 The effect of mental revolution training can be observed on individual, and at organizational level. The aims of this study are 1) to investigate the sustainability of participants improvement after mental revolution training; 2) to analyze factors that influence the continuity or discontinuity of the improvements, and lastly, 3) to identify changes that occur after mental revolution training. The research used desciptive qualitative approach. Data were obtained from interviews and documentation on 12 respondents. The results of the study found that from 12 mental revolution projects, only nine projects were still ongoing and three did not reach the initial target. There were three impending factors that affect the continuity and discontinuity, i.e. characteristics of individuals, organizations or work environment (coworkers, superiors, work equipment, and workload), and the last factor was training. Improvements after training were observable from two aspects. First, changes at individual levels. Second, changes on work results or quality of work. However, findings from previous studies found that the sustainability of individual projects only occurred at short-term levels or discontinued when participants completed the training. Factors that influence the sustainability of alumni projects are the quality of change projects, the existence of mid-term and long-term achievement milestones, support from leaders (mentors), mutations and effective teamwork.


Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. M. 2004. An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human resource development Review, 3(4), 385-416.

Hardjana, A. M. 2001. Training SDM yang efektif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Holton III, E. F. 1996. The flawed four‐level evaluation model. Human resource development quarterly, 7(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920070103.

Indriyanto, B. 2014. Mengkaji Revolusi Mental dalam Konteks Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 554-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.24832%2Fjpnk.v20i4.165.

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. 2017. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768.

Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. 2005. Transferring learning to behavior: Using the four levels to improve performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1970. Evaluation of training. In P.L. Browning (Ed.). Evaluation of Short-Term Training in Rehabilitation. Monograph, (3), pp. 35-56. College of Education. University of Oregon, Rehabilitation, Research, and Training Centre in Mental Retardation.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. 2012. Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256.

LAN, PKP2A. 2016. Laporan Kajian Sustainabilitas Inovasi Alumni Diklat Kepemimpinan Tingkat III Dan IV. Tahun 2016.” Makassar.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Noe, R.A. 2002. Employee training an development (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Sukmajadi, B. 2019. The role of mental revolution training on the improvement of civil servant professionalism in public services in dki jakarta provincial government. Monas: Jurnal Inovasi Aparatur, 1(1), 30-38. Retrieved from http://e-journal.bpsdm.jakarta.go.id/monas/article/view/3

Tannenbaum, S.I. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Mathieu, J.E. 1993. Factors that influence training effectiveness. A conceptual model anf longitudinal analysis (No. Navtrasyscen-TR-93-011). Naval Training System Center Orlando, Fl.

Tracey, J. B., & Tews, M. J. 1995. Training effectiveness: Accounting for individual characteristics and the work environment. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 36(6), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/001088049503600615.

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No.25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik

Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Administrasi Negara Nomor 6 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pelatihan Revolusi Mental Untuk Pelayanan Publik

How to Cite
Yapardy, Nirwati. 2019. “A MENTAL REVOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION:”. Jurnal Administrasi Negara 25 (1), 1 - 18. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v25i1.521.