PROMOTING LOCAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: A DEBUREAUCRATIZATION APPROACH TO UMKM DEVELOPMENT IN BAUBAU CITY

Authors

  • Irwan Ade Saputra Departemen Politik Pemerintahan Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Zarni Adia Purna Ilmu Administrasi Negara Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v30i1.2811

Keywords:

Debureaucratization, Regional Economic Growth, UMKM

Abstract

This research aims to examine the pattern of debureaucratization in the activities carried out by the government to support SMEs. The research method used is qualitative research with an exploratory type. Findings indicate that debureaucratization measures, such as utilizing digital platforms to empower creative communities, simplifying administrative processes in providing financial support and training, as well as issuing policies supporting SME development, have enhanced accessibility and responsiveness of services for SMEs. However, there are still structural constraints in the SME ecosystem affecting its growth, such as limited access to finance and infrastructure. Moreover, the implementation of policies and programs supporting SMEs is still suboptimal, resulting in limitations on SMEs' contribution to the Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP). Further research is recommended to delve deeper into the structural factors influencing SME growth, such as access to finance and infrastructure, and to conduct further evaluation of the implementation of policies and programs supporting SMEs, taking into account the administrative and institutional factors that affect their effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Csath, M. (2021). Crisis Situations: How Should Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Handle Them With A Long Term View? In Development and Learning in Organizations (Vol. 35, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2020-0086

Dinutistomo, I. A., & Lubis, A. W. (2021). MSME Lending and Bank Efficiency: Evidence from Indonesia. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(3).2021.09

Fasyehhudin, M., Jaya, B. P. M., & Rahman, Y. M. (2022). Deregulation and Debureaucratization of Business Licensing Services Through The Online Single Submission (OSS) System in Local Governments Post Government Regulation Number 24 of 2018 Concerning Electronically Integrated Business Licensing Services. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3129

Harseno, R. M. (2017). Kebijakan Deregulasi dan Debirokratisasi Regulasi Ekonomi Kemaritiman sebagai Katalisator Nawacita Indonesia Poros Maritim Dunia. Gema Keadilan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2017.3773

International Finance Corporation. (2021). The Unseen Sector: A Report on the MSME Opportunity in South Africa. International Finance Corporation.

Johnston, J. M., & Holt, S. B. (2021). Examining the Influence of Representative Bureaucracy in Public and Private Prisons. Policy Studies Journal, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12367

Kertati, I. (2021). Deregulasi dan Debirokratisasi dalam Pembangan UMKM Menghadapi COVID-19. MIMBAR ADMINISTRASI FISIP UNTAG Semarang, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.56444/mia.v18i2.2525

Kovač, P. (2021). Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Administrative Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010001

Lampropoulou, M. (2021). Agencification in Greece: A Parallel Public Sector? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2020-0252

Martini, A., Suradinata, E., Kusworo, K., Lambelanova, R., & Thahir, M. I. (2019). The Effect of Organizational Transformation, Compensation and Organizational Culture on Performance of Regional Government Bureaucracy in Sumedang Regency West Java Province. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i1.14439

Mey, D., Sahar, S., & Widayati, W. (2018). Analisis Potensi Lapangan Kerja Di Kota Baubau. JAGAT (Jurnal Geografi Aplikasi Dan Teknologi), 2(1).

Noegroho, A. B. A., & Arif, L. (2023). Collaborative Governance dalam Pembangunan UMKM Pudak Di Kecamatan Gresik Kabupaten Gresik. Journal Publicuho, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.85

Peters, B. G. (2021). Understanding Comparative Bureaucracy. In Administrative Traditions. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297253.003.0001

Prasetyo, P. E. (2020). The Role of Government Expenditure and Investment for MSME Growth: Empirical Study in Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.471

Putri, F., Sinulingga, W., Hidayati, S., & Juliza. (2020). Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Strategy to Improve Competitiveness in The Era of The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 801(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012124

Salsabila, D., Ma’ruf, A. R., & Adharani, Y. (2021). Merekonstruksi Arah Politik Hukum Pengembangan Perizinan Panas Bumi Untuk Pemanfaatan Tidak Langsung. JURNAL HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v4i1.9824

Seno, R. H. (2020). Reformasi Administrasi di Korea Selatan: Sebuah Pembelajaran Kesuksesan. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja Dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v23i2.667

Suci, Y. R. (2017). Perkembangan UMKM (Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultasi Ekonomi.

Supardi, S., Hariyadi, S., & Fahrudin, A. (2017). Analisis Keberlanjutan Pembangunan Kota Tepian Pantai (Studi Kasus: Kota Baubau Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara). Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.5.3.188-204

Syafiq, M. (2019). Birokrasi di Era Revolusi (Studi Pelayanan Perijinan Memulai Usaha di Indonesia). Journal of Social Politics and Governance Vo. 1 No. 1 Juni 2019, 1(1).

Ting, G., & Feng, C. (2019). Institutional Reorganization and its Impact on Decentralization. In Changing Central-Local Relations in China: Reform and State Capacity. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429038761-4

Tsvykh, V., & Nelipa, D. (2019). Contemporary Theory of Public Administration in the USA: from Post-Bureaucracy Paradigm by B. Armajani and M. Barzeley to Postmodern Concept by Ch. Fox and H. Miller. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Public Administration, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17721/2616-9193.2019/11-6/7

Vallentin, S. (2022). Trust, Power and Public Sector Leadership: A Relational Approach. In Trust, Power and Public Sector Leadership: A Relational Approach. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431104

Vodenko, K. V., Belasheva, I. V., Zalevskaya, A. A., Polshakova, I. N., & Tleptserisheva, S. A. (2019). The State Management of Ddevelopment of The Professional and Qualification Potential in Russian Higher Eeducation. On the Horizon, 27(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-07-2019-0047

Wakisaka, D. (2022). Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Organisational Culture of Mmigration Policy-Making and Administrative Elites. International Migration, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12919

Wang, Y., Qi, Y., & Chen, G. (2022). Participatory Governance and Local Government Responsiveness: Evidence from Participation in Politics on Television in China. Local Government Studies, 48(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.2009805

Yusuf, S., Seftiana, E., & Lidyah, R. (2022). Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah sebagai Sendi Perekonomian Indonesia. Journal of Regional Economics Indonesia, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/jrei.v3i2.9122

Zhang, Y., Zhai, W., & Li, W. (2023). Performance Ranking, Span of Ccontrol, and Grassroots Government Responsiveness. Review of Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12565

Published

2024-05-26

How to Cite

Ade Saputra, Irwan, and Zarni Adia Purna. 2024. “PROMOTING LOCAL ECONOMIC GROWTH: A DEBUREAUCRATIZATION APPROACH TO UMKM DEVELOPMENT IN BAUBAU CITY”. Jurnal Administrasi Negara 30 (1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v30i1.2811.