COLLABORATION BETWEEN HOSPITALS AND THE CIVIL REGISTRATION OFFICE IN PROVIDING CIVIL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
(CASE STUDY AT LA MAPPAPENNING REGIONAL PUBLIC HOSPITAL, SOUTH SULAWESI PROVINCE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v31i2.3596Keywords:
Public Service, Health, Civil Administration, Collaborative Governance, Collaborative AdvantageAbstract
This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of public service collaboration in the fields of health and civil administration. The study focuses on a case involving children born at the La Mappapenning Regional General Hospital (RSUD) in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. The collaboration between the RSUD and the Civil Registration Office (Dukcapil) of Bone Regency is designed to facilitate the direct issuance of civil documents (Birth Certificates, Family Cards, and Child Identity Cards) at the hospital, eliminating the need for a separate visit to the Dukcapil office. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach using Huxham's theory of Collaborative Advantage, which includes four dimensions: managing goals, managing trust, managing culture, and managing leadership. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation with fifteen informants. The results indicate that while the collaboration is effective due to the convenience and efficiency it provides, its implementation still faces challenges. Those challenges are differences in goals, an imbalance of roles, limitations of integrated information systems, and a lack of clarity in the leadership structure for decision-making. By adaptively managing the dynamics of trust, organizational culture, and the active participation of leaders from both institutions, this collaboration has the potential to become an innovative model for inclusive and effective public service. This research contributes theoretically to the practice of collaborative governance and offers practical recommendations for optimizing cross-sector partnerships in hospital-based public services.
Downloads
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Governance networks. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Policy, 552–557.
Alfaruqi, M. H. (2021). Inovasi Pelayanan Kelahiran Terpadu Dirumah Sakit Umum Daerah Sumbawa. Jurnal Tambora, 5(1), 7–14.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Ardyan, E., Boari, Y., Akhmad, A., Yuliyani, L., Hildawati, H., Suarni, A., Anurogo, D., Ifadah, E., & Judijanto, L. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Aziz, H. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dalam Memperoleh Akta Kelahiran Berdasarkan Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Anak. Lex Jurnalica, 15(1), 56–66.
Bachtiar, M., Rafiudin, C., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Analisis Peran Komunikasi Efektif dalam Supervisi Pendidikan Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Profesionalisme dan Kinerja Guru. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 3288–3296.
Batoebara, M. U. (2021). Inovasi dan Kolaborasi dalam Era Komunikasi Digital. Publik Reform, 8(1), 29–38.
Emerson, K. (2018). Collaborative governance of public health in low-and middle-income countries: lessons from research in public administration. BMJ Global Health, 3(Suppl 4), e000381.
Emmerson, D. K. (2012). Southeast Asia: minding the gap between democracy and governance. Journal of Democracy, 23(2), 62–73.
Fontecha-Tirado, M. M. (2019). Building Trust and Collaborating with Others. Consilience, 21, 100–120.
Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
Ketemaw, A., Ayenew, Z., & Zewde, S. (2024). Managing Diversity and Multi-Cultural Collaboration: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open, 14(4), 21582440241273932.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Nurhayati, N., Kusuma, H., & Rahman, A. (2024). Strategi Tata Kelola Kolaboratif Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Pelayanan Publik: Peran Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Kualitas Relasional. Jurnal Agregasi : Aksi Reformasi Government Dalam Demokrasi, 12(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.34010/agregasi.v12i2.14017
Pala, A., Larasati, E., Suwitri, S., & Ngalimun, N. (2019). Maternal and Child Health Services in The Border Area of Indonesia-East Timor-Based on Community Empowerment. Prizren Social Science Journal, 3(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v3i2.93
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
Razy, F., & Ariani, M. (2022). Analysis of the Juridical Protection of the Most Traditional Health Laws in the Perspective of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health. International Journal of Law and Public Policy, 4(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0401.276
Renjith, V., Renjulal, Yesodharan, Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2017). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM
Sasmitha, I. D., Tatasari, T., Khotimah, J., & Laudinsha, B. yossi. (2024). Presentasi dan kolaborasi sebagai pendorong utama kewirausahaan perempuan berkinerja tinggi. Social Sciences Journal (SSJ), 2(4), 76–90.
Sufianty, E. (2014). Kepemimpinan dan Perencanaan Kolaboratif pada Masyarakat Non Kolaboratif (Leadership and Collaborative Planning in Non-Collaborative Community). Journal of Regional and City Planning, 25(1), 78–96. http://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jpwk/article/view/1280/814
Temitope, T. (2023). Investigating Innovative Models of Governance and Collaboration for Effective Public Administration in a Multi-Stakeholder Landscape. International Journal Papier Public Review, 4(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijppr.v4i2.209
Tuomela, R., & Tuomela, M. (2005). Cooperation and Trust in Group Context. 27(27), 42–43.
Vangen, S. (2017). Culturally diverse collaborations: a focus on communication and shared understanding. Public Management Review, 19(3), 305–325.
Vangen, S., & Winchester, N. (2014). Managing cultural diversity in collaborations: A focus on management tensions. Public Management Review, 16(5), 686–707.
Wijayanti, W. (2016). Dynamics of the Obligation to Register Birth Certificates as a part of the Right to Issuance Population Documents. Constitutional Review, 2(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev224
Wiyantari Sutaryantha, M. P., & Kusumasari, B. (2020). Indigenous Collaborative Governance: An Understanding of Decision-Making Process at Desa Adat in Bali, Indonesia. Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 4(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.24843/UJLC.2020.v04.i02.p01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Politeknik STIA LAN Makassar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).